<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CO2 Emissions Electricity From Water &#187; Global Warming News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.au.climatecleanup.com/category/global-warming-news/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.au.climatecleanup.com</link>
	<description>Green Electricity Emissions Trading</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 01:32:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Legislation Cap &amp; Trade Taxation Nightmare</title>
		<link>http://www.au.climatecleanup.com/legislation-cap-trade-taxation-nightmare</link>
		<comments>http://www.au.climatecleanup.com/legislation-cap-trade-taxation-nightmare#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 04:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emission Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emission Reduction Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Burnout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Fired Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cogeneration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diesel Fired Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Green Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gas Offsets and Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gas Reduction and Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ghg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Products and Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatecleanup.com/?p=434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obviously the auctioning of Allowances and Quotas established a substantial source of revenue for the federal government which turns the initial environmental argument for regulating carbon dioxide to sustain life into a source of government revenue. This becomes a backdoor tax increase that would essentially force electric utilities to become tax collectors.  This viewpoint turns an environmental problem into an economic nightmare.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Legislation to address global warming runs the risk of turning a potential environmental catastrophe into an expensive economic nightmare!</strong></p>
<p>Government&#8217;s are looking to unilaterally and cost-effectively make significant changes in the Earth&#8217;s climate and in their desire to have legislation.</p>
<p>One recognizes that given the proposed environmental benefits (required environmental benefits if life is to sustained on planet Earth!) and expensive solutions, any action taken to address global warming will certainly increase the cost of electricity and other goods and services we use every day.  At any rate this is conventional thinking.</p>
<p>Commonly muted, governments may impose cap-and-trade programs to limit carbon emissions. Cap-and-trade systems work by setting a specific limit on airborne pollutants from sources like power plants, factories, refineries and any other business or source exceeding prescribed limits and requiring those sources to account for all emissions with issued allowances.</p>
<p>However, some cap-and-trade proposals for carbon dioxide contain a new twist: requiring existing businesses and other pollution sources to buy allowances known in the EEC as Carbon Quotas.</p>
<p>Allowances like those proposed in the US model would be auctioned, leading to huge cost burdens for any source of carbon dioxide emissions (the Australian model would hand out Quotas for free to carbon polluters). In the case of US power plants, those auction costs of obtaining Quotas raise uncertainty of what costs would be and would ultimately be passed on to consumers using the power. The public would experience varying rates of power costs depending on the proportion of Carbon emitted by their local Power Plants depending on the fuel used and its carbon burnout properties.</p>
<p>The economic impact of these costs is found not only in electricity but also in the increased cost of goods and services that use electricity.</p>
<p>Obviously the auctioning of Allowances and Quotas would establish a substantial source of revenue for the federal government which turns the initial environmental argument for regulating carbon dioxide to sustain life into a source of government revenue. This becomes a backdoor tax increase that would essentially force electric utilities to become tax collectors.  This viewpoint turns an environmental problem into an economic nightmare.</p>
<p>Much work is being done to develop new technologies to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from power plants, but those options are limited, largely untested and in the case of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) expensive. Yet potential legislation could create the choice between two evils: either be subject to the volatility of an auctions market and Carbon Exchanges or make huge capital investments in unproven technology to capture and store CO2.</p>
<p>Our approach has been to work on an energy solution that tries to accomplish environmental goals while taking affordability into account.  And our Black Box technology actually does reduce CO2 emissions, something Carbon Capture and Storage does not even attempt.  <a href="http://www.climatecleanup.com/know-how">Refer to our Know-how and Black Box Co2 Emission Reduction Device click here </a></p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.au.climatecleanup.com%2Flegislation-cap-trade-taxation-nightmare&amp;linkname=Legislation%20Cap%20%26amp%3B%20Trade%20Taxation%20Nightmare"><img src="http://www.au.climatecleanup.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.au.climatecleanup.com/legislation-cap-trade-taxation-nightmare/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paradise Lost Kiribati Pacific Island Nation</title>
		<link>http://www.au.climatecleanup.com/paradise-lost-kiribati-pacific-island-nation</link>
		<comments>http://www.au.climatecleanup.com/paradise-lost-kiribati-pacific-island-nation#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon Cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kiribati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paradise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Products and Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/?p=143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paradise lost: climate change forces South Sea islanders to seek sanctuary abroad]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><script type="text/javascript"><!--
	var articleheadline = "Paradise lost: climate change forces South Sea islanders to seek sanctuary abroad";
// --></script></p>
<h2>Paradise lost: climate change forces South Sea islanders to seek sanctuary abroad</h2>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img title="Paradise Lost" src="http://www.independent.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00031/kiribati_31557t.jpg" alt="null" width="294" height="194" /></p>
<p>After years of fruitless appeals for decisive action on <em>climate change</em>, the tiny South Pacific nation of Kiribati has concluded that it is doomed. Yesterday its President, Anote Tong, used World Environment Day to request international help to evacuate his country before it disappears.</p>
<p>Water supplies are being contaminated by the encroaching salt water, Mr Tong said, and crops destroyed. Beachside communities have been moved inland. But Kiribati – 33 coral atolls sprinkled across two million square miles of ocean – has limited scope to adapt. Its highest land is barely 6 feet above sea level.</p>
<p>Speaking in New Zealand, Mr Tong said i-Kiribati, as his countrymen are known, had no option but to leave. &#8220;We may be beyond redemption,&#8221; he said. &#8220;We may be at the point of no return, where the <strong>emissions in the atmosphere will carry on contributing to climate change</strong>, to produce a sea level change so in time our small, low-lying islands will be submerged.&#8221;</p>
<p>Source:  Independent <a title="paradise lost" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/australasia/paradise-lost-climate-change-forces-south-sea-islanders-to-seek-sanctuary-abroad-841409.html">http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/australasia/paradise-lost-climate-change-forces-south-sea-islanders-to-seek-sanctuary-abroad-841409.html</a></p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.au.climatecleanup.com%2Fparadise-lost-kiribati-pacific-island-nation&amp;linkname=Paradise%20Lost%20Kiribati%20Pacific%20Island%20Nation"><img src="http://www.au.climatecleanup.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.au.climatecleanup.com/paradise-lost-kiribati-pacific-island-nation/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World Expert on the CO2 Emissions Market</title>
		<link>http://www.au.climatecleanup.com/world-expert-on-the-co2-emissions-market</link>
		<comments>http://www.au.climatecleanup.com/world-expert-on-the-co2-emissions-market#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Green Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Products and Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/?p=123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Climate Cleanup Group is the Number One positioned Green Technology group in the world:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>World Expert on the CO2 Emissions Market</strong></p>
<p>The Climate Cleanup Group is the Number One positioned Green Technology group in the field of CO2 Emissions Reduction in the world.  This means 80+% of all global web traffic looking for CO2 Emissions Reduction information visit one of our websites.  Below is a random sample of screen shots from our Web Services department:</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-124" title="google_1_ccup_240209" src="http://www.co2.climatecleanup.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/google_1_ccup_240209.png" alt="google_1_ccup_240209" width="621" height="228" /><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-125" title="google_1_ccup_240209_2" src="http://www.co2.climatecleanup.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/google_1_ccup_240209_2.png" alt="google_1_ccup_240209_2" width="499" height="339" /><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-126" title="google_1_ccup_240209_3" src="http://www.co2.climatecleanup.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/google_1_ccup_240209_3.png" alt="google_1_ccup_240209_3" width="565" height="538" /><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-127" title="google_1_ccup_240209_4" src="http://www.co2.climatecleanup.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/google_1_ccup_240209_4.png" alt="google_1_ccup_240209_4" width="553" height="329" /><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-128" title="google_1_ccup_240209_5" src="http://www.co2.climatecleanup.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/google_1_ccup_240209_5.png" alt="google_1_ccup_240209_5" width="568" height="490" /><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-129" title="google_1_ccup_240209_6" src="http://www.co2.climatecleanup.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/google_1_ccup_240209_6.png" alt="google_1_ccup_240209_6" width="539" height="219" /><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-130" title="google_1_ccup_240209_7" src="http://www.co2.climatecleanup.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/google_1_ccup_240209_7.png" alt="google_1_ccup_240209_7" width="569" height="348" /><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-131" title="google_1_ccup_240209_8" src="http://www.co2.climatecleanup.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/google_1_ccup_240209_8.png" alt="google_1_ccup_240209_8" width="547" height="223" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #333399;">Would you like much sought after web assets like these for your company’s products and services?</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #333399;">If so, please send our <a title="web services department" href="http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/seo-web-services">Web Services department</a> an email enquiry by <a title="web services enquiry" href="mailto:enquiries@climatecleanup.com">clicking here</a> including your web site address and they will take a look and provide you with a quotation for Web Services.  They just love gunning for Number One on Google!<br />
</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #333399;">Thank you.</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong></strong></p>
<div id="attachment_82" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 122px; text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/seo-web-services"><strong><img class="size-full wp-image-82" title="seo-web-services" src="../wp-content/uploads/2009/02/seo-web-services.png" alt="SEO Web Services" width="112" height="60" /></strong></a></p>
<p class="wp-caption-text">SEO Web Services</p>
</div>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.au.climatecleanup.com%2Fworld-expert-on-the-co2-emissions-market&amp;linkname=World%20Expert%20on%20the%20CO2%20Emissions%20Market"><img src="http://www.au.climatecleanup.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.au.climatecleanup.com/world-expert-on-the-co2-emissions-market/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Export of CO2 Emissions to China from UK</title>
		<link>http://www.au.climatecleanup.com/export-co2-emissions-china-uk</link>
		<comments>http://www.au.climatecleanup.com/export-co2-emissions-china-uk#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon Cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Green Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[export]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/?p=119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
China&#8217;s growth is no figleaf for the real source of CO2 emissions: the UK

  
A worker rides past coal-fueled cooling towers at a power plant in Guangan Photograph: Frederic J Brown/AFP

Whenever a government or a corporation doesn&#8217;t want to do something, it blames China. You want fair terms of trade? Sorry, not when China&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="linktext">
<h3><span class="link-text">China&#8217;s growth is no figleaf for the real source of CO2 emissions: the UK</span></h3>
</div>
<div class="blog-image-caption"><a class="small mask" name="&amp;lid={trailItemImageAndTrailText}{Yellow Peril is distracting us from the real source of CO2 emissions: the UK}&amp;lpos={trail}{2}" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2009/feb/24/china-uk-c02-emissions-consumers"> <img class="image-in-trail" src="http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Environment/Pix/columnists/2009/2/24/1235475494928/china-emissions-001.jpg" alt="china emissions" width="460" height="276" /> </a></p>
<p class="caption">A worker rides past coal-fueled cooling towers at a power plant in Guangan Photograph: Frederic J Brown/AFP</p>
</div>
<p>Whenever a government or a corporation doesn&#8217;t want to do something, it blames China. You want fair terms of trade? Sorry, not when China&#8217;s dumping its goods on the world market. You want a 40-hour week? Forget it, the Chinese are working a 40-hour day.</p>
<p>Source: Guardian UK <a title="export of uk co2 emissions to china" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot">http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot</a></p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.au.climatecleanup.com%2Fexport-co2-emissions-china-uk&amp;linkname=Export%20of%20CO2%20Emissions%20to%20China%20from%20UK"><img src="http://www.au.climatecleanup.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.au.climatecleanup.com/export-co2-emissions-china-uk/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USA To Regulate Power Station CO2 Emissions</title>
		<link>http://www.au.climatecleanup.com/epa-will-regulate-power-station-co2-emissions</link>
		<comments>http://www.au.climatecleanup.com/epa-will-regulate-power-station-co2-emissions#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon Cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Green Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Products and Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/?p=103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The move would mean coal-fired power plants would be unlikely to receive the go-ahead without developing Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technology [ or use our Black Box CO2 Emission Reduction Technology refer http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/black-box ] . It could also open up heavy polluters to legal action by those who say they are affected by CO2 emissions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="clearfix">
<div class="articleTop">
<div class="articleTopPadding">
<div class="clearfix">
<div class="articleTopLeft">
<h2>EPA will regulate greenhouse gases,<br />
says US climate chief</h2>
<h6>Regulator will rule that carbon dioxide is a danger to public health under Clean Air Act</h6>
<div class="articlebyline"><span class="datecolour">24 Feb 2009</span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="articleLineHeight">
<div class="articleLinks">
<div class="content">
<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 190px"><strong><a href="http://climatecleanup.com"><img title="Per Capita CO2 Emissions Power Stations" src="http://climatecleanup.com/images/largest_power_polluters_180.jpg" alt="Per Capita CO2 Emissions Power Stations" width="180" height="72" /></a></strong><p class="wp-caption-text">Per Capita CO2 Emissions Power Stations</p></div>
<p><strong>The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will regulate carbon dioxide emissions from coal-fired power stations, Barack Obama&#8217;s climate chief said this week.</strong></p>
<p>Carol Browner, special adviser to the president on <em>climate change</em>, said in an interview on Sunday at the Western Governors&#8217; Association meeting in Washington that the EPA is looking at a ruling from a Supreme Court in 2007 that requires the agency to decide whether CO2 emissions are a danger to public health and &#8221; will make an endangerment finding&#8221;. [ Refer to our 17th February Entry <a title="epa" href="http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/epa-urged-to-act-on-climate-change">http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/epa-urged-to-act-on-climate-change</a> ]</p>
<p><strong>The decision will overrule a memo issued in the final days of the Bush administration that said that carbon dioxide emissions need not be considered when approving applications for new power plants.</strong></p>
<p>The move would mean coal-fired power plants would be unlikely to receive the go-ahead without developing Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technology <em>[ or use our Black Box CO2 Emission Reduction Technology refer <a title="CO2 Emission Reduction Technology" href="http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/black-box">http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/black-box </a>]</em> . <strong>It could also open up heavy polluters to legal action by those who say they are affected by CO2 emissions.</strong></p>
<p>When the review of the Supreme Court decision was announced last week, a permit application for a new coal-fired plant in Oklahoma was withdrawn within hours.</p>
<p>Many in the industry have argued that such a stringent change to policy should come through rules passed by Congress, rather than a decision by the regulator.</p>
<p>Browner also announced that the Obama administration is seeking to establish national rules for <strong>regulating emissions from cars</strong>.</p>
<p>&#8220;The hope across the administration is that we can have a unified national policy when it comes to cleaner vehicles,&#8221; Browner said.</p>
<p>But the <em>Washington Post</em> reports that rather than bypassing Congress on this policy, it is more likely that the Obama administration will seek to regulate it through a Congress-agreed cap-and-trade scheme, which would generate much-needed revenues for the federal government.</p>
<p>&#8220;The administration is engaged with Congress to pass cap-and-trade legislation, which the president believes is far superior to a regulatory approach using the existing Clean Air Act,&#8221; an official told the <em>Washington Post</em>.</p>
<p>&#8220;If [the EPA] finds that greenhouse gases endanger health or welfare, the next steps would be taken thoughtfully and with input from all stakeholders.&#8221;</p>
<p>The state of California is waiting to hear from the federal government whether or not it can regulate its own car emissions.</p>
<p>Source: <a title="usa to regulate power station co2 emissions" href="http://www.businessgreen.com/business-green/news/2237090/epa-regulate-greenhouse-gases">http://www.businessgreen.com/business-green/news/2237090/epa-regulate-greenhouse-gases</a></div>
</div>
</div>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.au.climatecleanup.com%2Fepa-will-regulate-power-station-co2-emissions&amp;linkname=USA%20To%20Regulate%20Power%20Station%20CO2%20Emissions"><img src="http://www.au.climatecleanup.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.au.climatecleanup.com/epa-will-regulate-power-station-co2-emissions/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Road transport has biggest long-term impact on global warming says EU</title>
		<link>http://www.au.climatecleanup.com/road-transport-has-biggest-long-term-impact-on-global-warming-says-eu</link>
		<comments>http://www.au.climatecleanup.com/road-transport-has-biggest-long-term-impact-on-global-warming-says-eu#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acid rain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Emission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ghg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHG reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gas Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOx Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOx emission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ozone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SO2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Emissions from transport affect the climate both in the short and long term. New research explored the size and mix of emissions with short and long-lived effects and found that road transport has the largest effect on global mean temperature. The study conducted under the EU-funded QUANTIFY project compared the effects of current emissions from road, air, rail and shipping. The study explored the effects of emissions from a single year over different time periods and found that emissions from road transport have the most impact in the long term (20-100 years).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table style="background-color: #ffffff;" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<div style="width: 90%; text-align: center;">
<div id="attachment_56" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-56" title="europa-enivronment-logo" src="http://www.climatecleanup.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/europa-enivronment-logo-300x51.jpg" alt="European Commission, Environment DG" width="300" height="51" /><p class="wp-caption-text">European Commission, Environment DG</p></div>
</div>
<div style="width: 90%; text-align: center;"><strong><span id="ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_lblTitulo" class="negritaGigante">Road transport has biggest long-term impact on global warming, says EU</span></strong></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<div style="width: 85%; text-align: center;">
<div style="text-align: center;"><span id="ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_lblSource"><strong></strong></span><span id="ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_lblPublished"><br />
</span><span id="ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_lblSource">European Commission, Environment DG</span> <span id="ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_lblPublished"><br />
</span><span id="ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_lblPublished">Published Feb. 13, 2009</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;"><br class="salto_linea_peq" /> <span id="ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_lblDescription"></p>
<div style="text-align: left;">Emissions from transport affect the climate both in the short and long term. New research explored the size and mix of emissions with short and long-lived effects and found that road transport has the largest effect on global mean temperature. The study conducted under the EU-funded QUANTIFY project compared the effects of current emissions from road, air, rail and shipping. The study explored the effects of emissions from a single year over different time periods and found that emissions from road transport have the most impact in the long term (20-100 years).CO2 is the only GHG that remains in the atmosphere for centuries. It has an influence on warming over relatively long time scales compared to other greenhouse gases (GHGs), such as ozone. The researchers calculated that high levels of CO2 emitted as a result of fuel consumption means that road transport has the largest contribution to global temperature increases when 20 to 100 year timescales are considered. In contrast, aviation has a large impact over a 10 year timescale because most of its effects result from short-lived gases, such as ozone, and induced cirrus clouds. Shipping illustrates this variation in the effects of emissions; SO2 and NOx emissions from shipping cause an cooling effect during the first 40 years, but on longer timescales CO2 emissions from shipping cause a net warming effect. It should be noted that SO2 and NOx have other negative environmental impacts, such as causing acid rain.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<p>The findings have important implications for policy as they demonstrate that the effectiveness of a GHG reduction strategy depends on its timescale. As an example, the authors give the EU&#8217;s target of limiting global warming to within 2°C above preindustrial levels. If this limit is to be reached within the next four decades, then a 40-year timescale is relevant. Over this timescale, the researchers calculate that the warming effect of aviation is 15 per cent of that caused by road transport. For shipping this figure is 4 per cent and for rail, just 2 per cent.</p>
<p>The research suggests that policies seeking to reduce the impact of current emissions in the longer term should focus on reducing emissions from road transport. However, if emissions need to be reduced in the short term, then policies should target aviation.</p>
<p>The study is based on estimates of global mean temperature and offers a simple tool that could help policymakers to assess the effects of future emissions scenarios on global temperatures. Previous studies have used an approach called &#8216;radiative forcing&#8217; (the difference between incoming and outgoing radiation), which the researchers suggest may be less easily applied in the context of making policy.</p>
<p><span id="ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_lblSource"><strong>Source and Article download:</strong> <a title="europa environment" href="http://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/research/newsalert/pdf/140na1.pdf">European Commission, Environment DG</a></span></div>
<p></span></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width: 100%;" align="center"><span id="ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_lblKeywords"></p>
<table class="textoGrande" style="height: 56px;" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="468">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.au.climatecleanup.com%2Froad-transport-has-biggest-long-term-impact-on-global-warming-says-eu&amp;linkname=Road%20transport%20has%20biggest%20long-term%20impact%20on%20global%20warming%20says%20EU"><img src="http://www.au.climatecleanup.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.au.climatecleanup.com/road-transport-has-biggest-long-term-impact-on-global-warming-says-eu/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
